Why wasn't President Bush impeached?
He should have been, and he could have been; and he still can be...
The illegal aliens tried to first force their granting of U.S. citizenship on the Communist Labor Day of May 1st, 2005 (Our American Labor Day is in September!) by SHUTTING DOWN THE ECONOMY OF THE USA DURING THEIR STRIKES!
You remember the strikes they had; don't you?
The strikes where they waved the flag of Mexico instead of old glory.
When Osama ordered his minions to fly those airplanes into the World Trade Center, he did not only want to kill Americans, HE WANTED TO SHUT DOWN THE ECONOMY OF THE USA!
Why then did McCain, Obama, and Clinton all support legislation that was written in secret from the voting public's eyes to give amnesty for the illegal aliens?
Why wasn't President Bush (and every other elected official) impeached for giving aid to a group that was organized and tried to SHUT DOWN THE ECONOMY OF THE USA?
This opportunity wasn't even publicly discussed by the medias!
Why is it that the media shuns away from digging deep into the issue of illegal immigration during the 2008 election cycle?
Most Americans do not know that if we deported the illegal aliens that wages for the working class would go up, and that there would be a BOOM of self employment opportunities for working class Americans (SORRY CEO'S!).
Does John Edwards address this fact? How about Ron Paul? Any of the candidates able to see ways to improve the quality of wages and benefits for America's working class that doesn't include some socialized tax dollar drenched proposal?
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Is being gay a choice?
My old reaction would have been an absolute "yes", but that has recently changed for me. But on a side note; I don't think people are actually born gay either.
I think every person who has ever, if even only a single time during their life, wanted to procreate and/or have a child (which I suspect is everyone) cannot be gay.
Sure you could argue that one doesn't need to "go through the motions" to procreate, but you have to then argue that people are born knowing advanced science; and that is just crazy talk to think people are born knowing about test-tube reproduction and/or cloning, etc.
Another point that I would like to observe is that there are many sexual perversions in the world and we do not say that people are born with these perversions.
We do not allow child molestors to argue that they were born to only desire sexual relations with young people. Nor do we allow people who prefer bestiality to claim they were born to only have sexual relations with animals. Nor feet. Nor bondage. Nor public acts. Nor voyeurs. Etc.
Yet we allow gay people to make a scientific claim which goes largely unchallenged due to the sensitive and private matter of the subject.
On a side note: Why do gays pressure or even make fun of other homosexuals who actually prefer to have their sexual activities kept private from the world? I think this is obvious "peer-pressure" and an indicator that they are not sure they were born gay as much as seeking acceptance when they possibly lack acceptance in other areas of their life.
So if a gay person is not born this way, then how do they end up acting gay.
First off, I suspect it has to do with the physical pleasure that sex brings people. If we view history and even being advertised now in modern Africa, we see that circumcision reduces the sexual pleasure for a man when he has sex and thus allows for men to more easily control their sexual urges.
The important aspect there was, "...allows for men to more easily control their sexual urges."
Sex results in a powerful climatic euphoric event; I don't think I need to go into further detail; one in which can be very desirable for both men and women. It is this "finale" that helps prod people to further explore their private sexual futures with a sense of comfort and assurance; and on the occassion into the world of homosexuality.
These are people who made a choice to be gay.
But I now also believe that there is not only the choice to be gay, but the convoluted guidance through imagery and peer-pressure to become gay.
An example is the famed Teletubby declaration by a famous religious person whose name I do not remember. If he was talking more about how the Teletubby that carried the purse around was not merely just a big, purple Teletubby, but instead that the purse carrying Teletubby appears to be the oldest and largest member of the Teletubby family (the one that seems to be the "man of the Teletubby house") is carrying a pursue like mommy ,then I would say he could be correct in his suspicion about homosexual imagery for children.
Mass media can have a profound psychological impacts on people at any age; leaving people with false impressions about reality, or historic events, and even be used for propoganda as Hitler discovered.
One easy example is the first radioed story "War of the Worlds" which brought mass panic in the USA.
Another good and more current example is plastic surgery. I suspect that there would be far fewer people "going under the knife" if there weren't television programs dedicated to showing plastic surgery which gives people a greater comfort about doing it themselves after a thirty minute glimpse into surgically altering one's self forever.
So I suspect that some gay people are gay by choice, but there are also gay people who are pschologically lured into being gay through imagery (movies, and regular television programming), or peer-pressure, or even other psychological factors.
If television didn't have such an impact, then why do they have to sometimes say, "Please do not try this at home!"?
I do not believe that being gay is a birth defect.
I think every person who has ever, if even only a single time during their life, wanted to procreate and/or have a child (which I suspect is everyone) cannot be gay.
Sure you could argue that one doesn't need to "go through the motions" to procreate, but you have to then argue that people are born knowing advanced science; and that is just crazy talk to think people are born knowing about test-tube reproduction and/or cloning, etc.
Another point that I would like to observe is that there are many sexual perversions in the world and we do not say that people are born with these perversions.
We do not allow child molestors to argue that they were born to only desire sexual relations with young people. Nor do we allow people who prefer bestiality to claim they were born to only have sexual relations with animals. Nor feet. Nor bondage. Nor public acts. Nor voyeurs. Etc.
Yet we allow gay people to make a scientific claim which goes largely unchallenged due to the sensitive and private matter of the subject.
On a side note: Why do gays pressure or even make fun of other homosexuals who actually prefer to have their sexual activities kept private from the world? I think this is obvious "peer-pressure" and an indicator that they are not sure they were born gay as much as seeking acceptance when they possibly lack acceptance in other areas of their life.
So if a gay person is not born this way, then how do they end up acting gay.
First off, I suspect it has to do with the physical pleasure that sex brings people. If we view history and even being advertised now in modern Africa, we see that circumcision reduces the sexual pleasure for a man when he has sex and thus allows for men to more easily control their sexual urges.
The important aspect there was, "...allows for men to more easily control their sexual urges."
Sex results in a powerful climatic euphoric event; I don't think I need to go into further detail; one in which can be very desirable for both men and women. It is this "finale" that helps prod people to further explore their private sexual futures with a sense of comfort and assurance; and on the occassion into the world of homosexuality.
These are people who made a choice to be gay.
But I now also believe that there is not only the choice to be gay, but the convoluted guidance through imagery and peer-pressure to become gay.
An example is the famed Teletubby declaration by a famous religious person whose name I do not remember. If he was talking more about how the Teletubby that carried the purse around was not merely just a big, purple Teletubby, but instead that the purse carrying Teletubby appears to be the oldest and largest member of the Teletubby family (the one that seems to be the "man of the Teletubby house") is carrying a pursue like mommy ,then I would say he could be correct in his suspicion about homosexual imagery for children.
Mass media can have a profound psychological impacts on people at any age; leaving people with false impressions about reality, or historic events, and even be used for propoganda as Hitler discovered.
One easy example is the first radioed story "War of the Worlds" which brought mass panic in the USA.
Another good and more current example is plastic surgery. I suspect that there would be far fewer people "going under the knife" if there weren't television programs dedicated to showing plastic surgery which gives people a greater comfort about doing it themselves after a thirty minute glimpse into surgically altering one's self forever.
So I suspect that some gay people are gay by choice, but there are also gay people who are pschologically lured into being gay through imagery (movies, and regular television programming), or peer-pressure, or even other psychological factors.
If television didn't have such an impact, then why do they have to sometimes say, "Please do not try this at home!"?
I do not believe that being gay is a birth defect.
Friday, December 14, 2007
Why Republicans are not satisfied.
Republican voters see opportunity available to be snatched from the jaws of Democrats and wonder why their field of candidates "won't go there".
The opportunity is indeed sensitive; forelaid with a perilous suicidal tendency for anyone uncomfortable with talking in front of large crowds to seek political office and providing a plethora of attractive soundbites that any corporate media would mold into an uncomfortable coffin.
But just what is this opportunity?
The opportunity, as I see it, is the opportunity to be reborn as a party fighting for the less fortunate folks in America. The working class. Blue collar workers. Those who live check to check and even those who don't make it from check to check.
The most obvoius undiscussed issue imapcting negatively on working class Americans is the ILLEGAL immigrants.
The more workers there are available to businesses means the businesses can hire workers for much lower wages.
Think of it in terms of blue collar applications: If you and one other person puts in an application for work then you will have a fifty-fifty chance of being hired and better able to negotiate the wage and perhaps benefits. The same is simply not true if there are ten applicants or twenty applicants.
It is no secret (except to the corporate TV medias?) that both Hillary and Obama knew they were running for the highest office of the land (and I am not forgetting all the other candidates who squandered an opportunity to demonstrate clear leadership and unity on this nationally important topic) and still hid behind George Bush's coat-tails while the Democrats demanded that he (Bush) better "sell" amnesty for 12-20 million illegal aliens that was ultimately thwarted by a unified USA for a second time.
There are many undisclosed negative impacts from the ILLEGAL immigrants:
Electricity consumption
Water consumptuion
Healthcare costs forwarded into insurance costs
Wage deflation
Pollution and waste production
Infrastructure (roads, bridges, powerlines, etc) needs that were unplanned
Increased criminal activity
Decreased police effectiveness
Judicial backlogging
Voter fraud
All very important aspects and I could even go on and on.
Who wouldn't like to know that we are decreasing the amount of electricty our country uses as a whole and thus decreasing the cost of everyone's electrical bills (residential and commercial electrical costs)?
Right now, the corporate medias are "selling" the perception that ILLEGAL immigration should be considered only a Republican issue. This is simply a diversion from having to provide an in depth analysis of the ILLEGAL immigration situation onto candidates from both parties and a discussion of the impacts on the entire country and economy.
In the upcoming months, the TV media will probably begin a propaganda campaign that wages need to be kept down in order to help contain inflation.
But inflation caused by increasing wages from the bottom of the economic earnings scale is actually not as bad as some people will pretend. Especially since we don't buy much made in America! And the lowest of wage earners are actually getting more money in their pockets!
This my friends is a need in capitalism and is what the US economy needs more than simply injecting cheap labor into our economy which lowers wages for blue collar workers and maximizes profits for multinational corporations.
How to cause wage growth? Deportation of the ILLEGAL immigrants.
I would establish a national hotline for all illegal aliens to make there where-abouts known and who they are working for within a 12 month window. After the 12 month period, all illegal aliens found not registered will be treated as potential terrorists or drug/human smugglers. The others who willfully pronounced themselves would be given proper/basic consideration to have their wages garnished to pay for their own way home, and we also consider allowing families with children under six years of age to stay and get vaccines before returning as a family to their parent(s) homeland.
I also say we should finger print all illegal alien's children born in the USA for records that would allow these children born in the USA to return as LEGAL immigrants when they turn 18 years old.
PS. The national minimum wage should be between $9 and $10 an hour; perhaps $9.11?
The opportunity is indeed sensitive; forelaid with a perilous suicidal tendency for anyone uncomfortable with talking in front of large crowds to seek political office and providing a plethora of attractive soundbites that any corporate media would mold into an uncomfortable coffin.
But just what is this opportunity?
The opportunity, as I see it, is the opportunity to be reborn as a party fighting for the less fortunate folks in America. The working class. Blue collar workers. Those who live check to check and even those who don't make it from check to check.
The most obvoius undiscussed issue imapcting negatively on working class Americans is the ILLEGAL immigrants.
The more workers there are available to businesses means the businesses can hire workers for much lower wages.
Think of it in terms of blue collar applications: If you and one other person puts in an application for work then you will have a fifty-fifty chance of being hired and better able to negotiate the wage and perhaps benefits. The same is simply not true if there are ten applicants or twenty applicants.
It is no secret (except to the corporate TV medias?) that both Hillary and Obama knew they were running for the highest office of the land (and I am not forgetting all the other candidates who squandered an opportunity to demonstrate clear leadership and unity on this nationally important topic) and still hid behind George Bush's coat-tails while the Democrats demanded that he (Bush) better "sell" amnesty for 12-20 million illegal aliens that was ultimately thwarted by a unified USA for a second time.
There are many undisclosed negative impacts from the ILLEGAL immigrants:
Electricity consumption
Water consumptuion
Healthcare costs forwarded into insurance costs
Wage deflation
Pollution and waste production
Infrastructure (roads, bridges, powerlines, etc) needs that were unplanned
Increased criminal activity
Decreased police effectiveness
Judicial backlogging
Voter fraud
All very important aspects and I could even go on and on.
Who wouldn't like to know that we are decreasing the amount of electricty our country uses as a whole and thus decreasing the cost of everyone's electrical bills (residential and commercial electrical costs)?
Right now, the corporate medias are "selling" the perception that ILLEGAL immigration should be considered only a Republican issue. This is simply a diversion from having to provide an in depth analysis of the ILLEGAL immigration situation onto candidates from both parties and a discussion of the impacts on the entire country and economy.
In the upcoming months, the TV media will probably begin a propaganda campaign that wages need to be kept down in order to help contain inflation.
But inflation caused by increasing wages from the bottom of the economic earnings scale is actually not as bad as some people will pretend. Especially since we don't buy much made in America! And the lowest of wage earners are actually getting more money in their pockets!
This my friends is a need in capitalism and is what the US economy needs more than simply injecting cheap labor into our economy which lowers wages for blue collar workers and maximizes profits for multinational corporations.
How to cause wage growth? Deportation of the ILLEGAL immigrants.
I would establish a national hotline for all illegal aliens to make there where-abouts known and who they are working for within a 12 month window. After the 12 month period, all illegal aliens found not registered will be treated as potential terrorists or drug/human smugglers. The others who willfully pronounced themselves would be given proper/basic consideration to have their wages garnished to pay for their own way home, and we also consider allowing families with children under six years of age to stay and get vaccines before returning as a family to their parent(s) homeland.
I also say we should finger print all illegal alien's children born in the USA for records that would allow these children born in the USA to return as LEGAL immigrants when they turn 18 years old.
PS. The national minimum wage should be between $9 and $10 an hour; perhaps $9.11?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)